Why Meyer’s claim to be “anti-human” is anti-Christian – the Incarnation

As we approach Christmas, there are some beautiful readings on the Incarnation which give us a real insight into human dignity. Reflecting on them gives us added reason to question the compatibility of the work of Stephenie Meyer with the truths of the Christian Faith.

What exactly does Meyer say about human beings?  It wasn’t until I had read In Love with Death – The Twilight of American fiction By Gina R. Dalfonzo in National Review online (here) that I realized that Meyer claimed to be “anti-human” on her own website.  The relevant quote from the Dalfonzo article here:

“Meyer once retorted to critics who accused her of misogyny, “I am not anti-female; I am anti-human.” Whether she was aware of it or not, this was far more than just a flippant remark. Just like the allegedly positive messages about romance and sexuality, any value that Meyer and her characters place on human life is only on the surface.” 

You see the evidence of this worldview in the books, especially after Bella is “turned” into a vampire.  For example, see Breaking Dawn p.469 when she contrasts her prior “hideous human” face with her new “glorious immortal” vampire face.

Why is such language anti-Christian?

Look at the contrast with the lofty understanding of the human person, especially in light of the Incarnation – when the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, the Word through Whom all things were made, took our human nature in the God-man Jesus Christ, born of the Virgin:

The mystery of our reconciliation with God
“To speak of our Lord, the son of the Blessed Virgin Mary, as true and perfect man is of no value to us if we do not believe that he is descended from the line of ancestors set out in the Gospel.
Matthew’s gospel begins by setting out the genealogy of Jesus Christ, son of David, son of Abraham, and then traces his human descent by bringing his ancestral line down to his mother’s husband, Joseph. On the other hand, Luke traces his parentage backward step by step to the actual father of mankind, to show that both the first and the last Adam share the same nature.
No doubt the Son of God in his omnipotence could have taught and sanctified men by appearing to them in a semblance of human form as he did to the patriarchs and prophets, when for instance he engaged in a wrestling contest or entered into conversation with them, or when he accepted their hospitality and even ate the food they set before him. But these appearances were only types, signs that mysteriously foretold the coming of one who would take a true human nature from the stock of the patriarchs who had gone before him. No mere figure, then, fulfilled the mystery of our reconciliation with God, ordained from all eternity. The Holy Spirit had not yet come upon the Virgin nor had the power of the Most High overshadowed her, so that within her spotless womb Wisdom might build itself a house and the Word become flesh. The divine nature and the nature of a servant were to be united in one person so that the Creator of time might be born in time, and he through whom all things were made might be brought forth in their midst.
For unless the new man, by being made in the likeness of sinful flesh, had taken on himself the nature of our first parents, unless he had stooped to be one in substance with his mother while sharing the Father’s substance and, being alone free from sin, united our nature to his, the whole human race would still be held captive under the dominion of Satan. The Conqueror’s victory would have profited us nothing if the battle had been fought outside our human condition. But through this wonderful blending the mystery of new birth shone upon us, so that through the same Spirit by whom Christ was conceived and brought forth we too might be born again in a spiritual birth; and in consequence the evangelist declares the faithful to have been born not of blood, nor of the desire of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.”   

(This is from today’s –  Dec.17 – Office of Readings – A letter of Pope St. Gregory the Great)

 We are born of God.  Created by Him and then re-created through salvation won by the God-man, Jesus Christ.  Christ has bestowed an unparalleled dignity upon us, that we might be called “children of God” – for so we are.  (1 John 3: 1-2).  No human face is hideous.  No Christian can be anti-human. 



  1. […] Why Meyer’s claim to be “anti-human” is anti-Christian – the Incarnation […]

  2. shes’nt oanti-human, she si anti whats’ the wrod ,anti-evil huamsn buecase wer ar all sinners. icnlduign and her (God bless for christma morals in books) I lvoe STe[hanie Meyer. serisouyl;. were soem thigns I was offend by yes. but I still voe the boosk, they do have sex ib the foruth book afte they’re married and in the ;alter aprt, it goes nito a beti detial before but after that it’s ujut impleid. when ahvign sex is firted mtinoed, what happen before adn the mroign after is mentioned not explcit. when it geos into the alter part, I fele it si doen in atesful and it’s mor petoic not s doe in a distasteful.

  3. Meyer’s a ***** who does not see that flaws in human beings are what make them beautiful. She constantly degrades them or casts them aside-her PERFECT BELLA is only happy and content when she is finally changed into a vampire. Ultimate ********.
    Editors note: I appreciate your comment, Safad, and I think there is truth in what you say about Meyer’s treatment of people – but I bleeped the cursing.

  4. God says,

    “And We have created man in the best possible form,” in the Quran … Meyer’ treatment of human beings is not only against Christianity but also against Islam and Judaism …

  5. Have you ever read The Host? I think that the “anti-human” remark would be more in reference to that book – I personally thought it was better then Twilight. I’d really be interesting in hearing your opinion on that book.

  6. Stephanie Meyer is practicing member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Why would she write books that are anti-christian?

  7. The Jewish leadershiip were practicing members of ‘The Law’ – Why then would they murder Christ? – A ‘practicing member’ of anything – does not define a person

    It is our actions that define us – and most definently our writing!

  8. Amen.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s